|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This project is no longer currentEvaluation of the Hazard of Microcystis Blooms for Human Health through Fish ConsumptionPrimary Investigators:
Co-Investigator:
Overview
Objective
Proposed WorkMicrocystin Toxicokinetics ExperimentsPast experimentation of dosing perch with known amount of microcystin and measuring the amount in tissues will be repeated, narrowing our time frame on the 24 hour window and increasing the number of fish per treatment. We will again use young yellow perch that have been farm-raised. We will also dose the perch with a range of microcystin concentrations to determine if the depuration and accumulation rates are constant. Microcystin concentrations in the perch liver and muscle will be measured both by ELISA (the standard technique used for the summer 2007 samples) as well as by the protein phosphatase inhibition assay. This second assay measures phosphatase enzyme depletion, which will be affected by both bound and unbound microcystin, thus providing some measure of the unextractable, presumably less hazardous form.
Accomplishments
Scientific RationaleBlooms of Microcystis are increasingly prevalent in western Lake Erie and many smaller inland lakes (Murphy et al 2003). The production of hepatotoxin microcystin (toxin) may have significant impacts on animal and human health. In mammals, microcystin inhibits serine/theonine protein phosphatases (Dawson 1998) which causes disintegration of the liver structure, liver necrosis, and internal hemorrhage in the liver that can lead to death (Dow and Swoboda 2000). Most human exposure occurs through contact with contaminated drinking water and inhalation/ingestion of microcystin in aquatic recreation. There is circumstantial evidence of exposure and toxicity to humans consuming contaminated fish (Dawson 1998) and measured concentrations in fish tissues that would exceed acceptable daily intake levels (de Magalhaes et al. 2001, 2003). For an average individual (weighing 60 kg), this would correlate to a fish microcystin concentration of 12.3 ng g-1based on the current WHO value of 0.04 µg kg-1d-1and a fish meal corresponding to ½ pound fresh fish. However, after reviewing data from Heinze (1999), EPA lower the recommended limit for chronic exposure to 0.003 µg kg-1d-1. This would correspond to a fish microcystin concentration of 0.92 ng g-1, given the same constraints as above. To better estimate the levels of concern for communities who eat large quantities of fish, we used the Washington State Fish (Keill and Kissinger 1999) consumption data for native peoples. The median consumption of fish for these communities is 43 g d-1, which would correspond to a maximum recommended fish microcystin concentration of 4.9 ng g-1. However, most (90%) of the people in these communities eat up to 127 g d-1, in which case fish microcystin concentrations of less than 1.65 ng g-1are necessary to prevent potential human illness. Thus, the potential of fish in the Great Lakes to serve as a source of contamination to humans should be evaluated.
Figure 1: Monthly averages (Jun-Oct 2006) of microcystin concentrations in yellow perch from western Lake Erie (from presentation by Wilson) The focus of most of the research of algal toxins on fish has been in tissue accumulation as a mode of human exposure, but the toxicokinetics of microcystin accumulation in fish have not yet been established. An inherent difficulty in trying to correlate microcystin concentrations in fish tissue to exposure is that the mobility of fish allows them to spend time in and out of Microcystis blooms. While measurements of microcystin concentrations in field-collected fish are useful in identifying whether this is a potential route for human exposure, it reveals less about the mechanism of accumulation. Understanding the rates of microcystin uptake, transfer efficiency into the tissues and depuration rates are essential to predicting potential human health impacts through fish consumption following a Microcystis bloom. Governmental/Societal RelevanceThe presence of Microcystis in the Great Lakes since the invasion of the zebra mussel has been well documented. The WHO has set standards for human health for both drinking water and recreation and the concentration for daily consumption. The concentrations in water exceed the WHO standards but the information on the consumption route through fish remains unknown. This work will help establish whether or not this route must also be considered for protection of human health in the Great Lakes. Relevance to Ecosystem ForecastingPredicting the risk to human health depends on establishing exposure conditions that occur in the environment. Specific predictions of the potential for human health effects from microcystin depend on forecasting the extent of harmful algal blooms. Predictions also depend on the development of the relationship between the extent of the bloom and the exposure to fish, and the link between exposure concentrations and the accumulation of the toxin in the edible tissue of fish. While predictions can then be made based on the WHO limits for chronic ingestion of microcystin, additional development of the specific factors such as ingestion rates for the local population and the toxicokinetics of microcystin in fish would lead to a more sound exposure scenario. This project is the first step in developing a risk assessment prediction by developing the link between the concentrations in the ecosystem and those in consumable parts of the food web. Once we establish that sufficient concentrations of microcystin can be found in fish, we can establish the relationship between exposure to Microcystis and fish tissue concentrations. ProductsPresentationsDyble, J., Fahnenstiel G., Millie, D., and Gossiaux, D. 2007. Integrating Environment and Human Health, National Council for Science and the Environment 7th annual conference, The impacts of Harmful Algal Blooms on human health in the Great Lakes, 1-2 Feb 07, Washington, DC Dyble, J., Fahnenstiel G., Millie, D., and Gossiaux, DOHH Annual Meeting, Current successes, challenges, and going forward at the Center of Excellence for Great Lakes and Human Health 25 March 2007, WHOI. Landrum, P.F. and D.C. Gossiaux. Evaluation of the hazard of Microcystis blooms for human health through fish consumption. Ocean and Human Health All PI Meeting, January 17-20, 2006, Charleston, SC. Sedgman, E. 2006. Evaluation of the Hazard of Microcystis Blooms for Human Health through Fish Consumption. NOAA Hollings Fellow Conference. Silver Springs, Maryland. PublicationsWilson, A.E., Gossiaux, D.C., Hook, T.O., Berry, J.P., Landrum, P.F., Dyble, J. and S.J. Guildford. Submitted, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Evaluation of the human health threat associated with the hepatotoxin microcystin, in the muscle and liver tissues of yellow perch (Perca flavescens). ReferencesDawson, R.M. 1998. The toxicology of microcystins. Toxicon 36:953-962. De Magalães, V.F., Soares, R.M., Azevedo, S.M.F.O. 2001. Microcystin contamination in fish from Jacarepaguá Lagoon (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil): ecological implication and human health risk. Toxicon 39:1077-1085. De Magalães, V.F., Marinho, M.M., Domingos, P., Oliveira A.C., Costa, S.M., Azevedo, L.O., Azevedo, S.M.F.O. 2003. Microcystins (cyanobiacteria hepatotoxins) bioaccumulation in fishe and crustaceans from Sepetiba Bay (Brasil, RJ). Toxicon 42:289-295. Dow, C.S., Swoboda, U.K. 2000. Cyanotoxins. In Whitton, B.A., Potts, M. (Eds.) The Ecology of Cyanobacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 613-632. Heinze, R. 1999. Toxicity of the cyanobacterial toxin microcystin-LR to rats after 28 days intake with drinking water. Environ. Toxicol. 14:57-60. Ito, E., Kondo, F., Terao, K., Harada, K.I., 1997. Neoplastic nodular formation in mouse liver induced by repeated intraperitoneal injections of microcystin-LR. Toxicon 35:1453-1457. Keill, L. and Kissinger, L. 1999. Draft analysis and selection of fish consumption rates for Washington State risk assessments and risk-based standards. Washington Dept. of Ecology Pub. No. 99-200, Olympia, WA, Kitchell, J.F., Stewart, D.J., Weininger, D. 1977. Applications of a bioenergetics model to yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34:1922-1935. Madenjian, C.P., O’Connor, D.V. Nortrup, D.A. 2000. A new approach toward evaluation of fish bioenergetics models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57:1025-1032. Murphy, T.P., Irvine, K., Guo, J., Davies, J., Murkin, H., Charlton, M., Watson, S.B. 2003. New microcystin concerns in the lower Great Lakes. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada 38:127-140. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||