|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Evolution of Invasive Species: Characterization and Effects of Adaptive Changes in Bythotrephes Tail SpinePrimary Investigator:Doran Mason - NOAA/GLERL Co-Investigators:Scott Peacor - Michigan State University* Executive Summary of Rationale
Proposed WorkCurrent/Ongoing We propose to quantify contemporary phenotypic and genotypic variation in tail spine length of Great Lakes Bythotrephes using quantitative genetics techniques. We will test whether the size of the spine in Bythotrephes mediates a life history trade-off between the survival benefits of a longer spine and its fecundity costs. We further propose that the relative importance of gape-limited predation dictates the resolution of this trade-off, driving the evolution of spine morphology. We will, therefore, look for evidence of evolutionary changes in this important trait associated with Bythotrephes establishment within novel North American predator communities. The negative effects of spine length on fish consumption are well established, but we will further test the food web consequences of evolutionary changes since the arrival of Bythotrephes in North America by performing predation experiments between naïve and contemporary Bythotrephes and Daphnia mendotae resurrected from deep and shallow sediment layers, respectively. Scientific RationaleThe complexities of food web disruption by the invasion of Bythotrephes and other invertebrate species in the Great Lakes demand novel and integrative approaches to understanding and managing invasion. As a result, there is a global trend in fisheries and aquatic systems management in which the complex forces affecting ecosystems are examined from an ecosystem perspective (Christensen et al. 1996).
We propose to examine the effect of Bythotrephes on Great Lakes ecosystems, with emphasis on the dynamic nature of interactions between predators and prey. We propose that evolutionary and phenotypically plastic changes in a conspicuous trait of Bythotrephes, its long protective tail spine, have had important implications for species interactions and food web dynamics in Great Lakes ecosystems. Effects of Bythotrephes Invasion
By consuming large-bodied zooplankton, Bythotrephes is a competitor with young-of-year (YOY) and planktivorous adult fish, and therefore, can have deleterious effects on recruitment and survival. For example, the timing of the yellow perch decline in Lake Michigan closely followed Bythotrephes invasion (Vanderploeg et al. 2002; Dettmers et al. 2003). Bythotrephes can also affect fish by disrupting a fish’s foraging ability (Barnhisel and Kerfoot 2004). Several adult fish depend on Bythotrephes as prey including alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus; Mills et al. 1992), yellow perch (Schneeberger 1991; Baker et al. 1992), and rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax; Parker et al. 2001) among others (Compton and Kerfoot 2004). Fish consumption of Bythotrephes (and their spines) can lead to fish injury (Compton and Kerfoot 2004) and increase the handling time for small fish. This can reduce growth and increase mortality. Finally, recent precipitous declines in Lake Huron alewife (Johnson et al. 2005), and decreased condition of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), have been hypothesized to result from voracious planktivory by Bythotrephes during late summer (Eshenroder, R.L. pers. comm.). Trait-Mediated Effects of Invaders Ecological effects of Bythotrephes depend not just on the number of invading individuals but also on interaction strengths between Bythotrephes and native species (Werner and Peacor 2003; Fig. 2). Changes in interaction strengths cause predator “nonlethal effects” (also called trait-mediated effects). In this case, the predator causes a change in prey phenotype, including behavioral, physiological, life-history, or morphological traits, which in turn affect the interaction strength between predator and prey. For example, Daphnia are known to respond to predators by modifying the timing and depth of vertical migrations, modifying swimming motions and speed, reducing foraging rates, and increasing the size of morphological defenses (reviewed in Tollrian and Harvell 1999). These traits are modified in the presence of predators in order to reduce the predator’s ability to detect, capture or consume the prey (i.e., the interaction strength). K.L. Pangle and S.D. Peacor demonstrated that predator nonlethal effects on Daphnia in Lake Michigan can be much greater (up to 10 fold) than lethal effects (Fig. 3). While perhaps surprising, this remarkable result is supported by theory developed specifically for Lake Michigan. Therefore, the nonlethal effect of a predator can contribute substantially to the net effect of the predator, even overwhelming density effects caused by consumption. Since Bythotrephes is both a zooplankton predator and fish prey (as in Figure 1), it has likely not only induced trait changes in zooplankton but also adjusted its own phenotype to better avoid fish predation. Evolutionary Change over Ecological Time Scales: Trait Mediated Effects due to Evolution Individual differences in per capita interaction strength can also change due to species evolution (see Box 1). Evolution and genetics are important to our understanding of the process and effects of invasion because 1) the genetics of key traits can influence a species’ ability to successfully invade, and 2) traits important to interactions with native species, and hence the net ecosystem effect of the invasion, can continue to evolve even after establishment (Lee 2002). Evolution of Trophic Linkages Recent examples of rapid contemporary evolution (on time scales of years or decades; e.g., Reznick et al. 1997; Grant and Grant 2002; Réale et al. 2003; McAdam and Boutin 2004) have highlighted the relevance of evolutionary changes to conservation biology and management (reviewed by Stockwell et al. 2003). For example, evolutionary changes in the diapause phenology of a freshwater copepod (Onychodiaptomus sanguineus) in response to fish predation (Hairston and Dillon 1990) were calculated to have occurred at about one quarter the rate of ecological changes in the abundance of fish predators (Hairston et al. 2005). Anthropogenic changes in environmental conditions are thought to be particularly important to rapid contemporary evolutionary change (Palumbi 2001). In particular, many examples of rapid evolutionary change have resulted from the novel selective pressures associated with biological invasions (see Reznick and Ghalambor 2001; Mooney and Cleland 2001). Despite the potential for rapid evolutionary adaptation of invaders to their novel environment (Lambrinos 2004) and native species to the arrival of an exotic species we still know little about the importance of these evolutionary changes to food web dynamics. Bythotrephes Tail Spine as an Important Trait for Food Web Interactions The conspicuous antipredatory tail spine of Bythotrephes is an effective deterrent against gape-limited fishes (‹100 mm in length), causing the predator fish to reject or avoid Bythotrephes as prey (Branstrator 2005; Compton and Kerfoot 2004). Several studies have documented avoidance or inability of small fish to consume Bythotrephes, including YOY yellow perch, alewife, rainbow smelt, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis), and lake herring (Coregonus artedi; Barnhisel 1991a; Barnhisel 1991b; Schneeberger 1991; Baker et al. 1992; Barnhisel and Harvey 1995; Compton and Kerfoot 2004). This long spine can comprise over 10% of adult body mass (Sullivan and Lehman 1998, Branstrator 2005) and 80% of body length (Barnhisel and Harvey 1995). Such a heavy investment in post-contact anti-predatory defenses contrasts with some native planktivorous cladocerans, such as L. kindtii, that specialize in pre-contact defenses like transparency (Branstrator 2005). As a result, the length of the spine appears to represent a key trait influencing food web dynamics in the Great Lakes and surrounding inland waters. Short-term Evolution of Tail Spines since Arrival in the Great Lakes Longer spines appear to benefit Bythotrephes through increased avoidance by fish predators (Compton and Kerfoot 2004; Barnhisel 1991b), thereby enhancing early survival (Sullivan and Lehman 1998). This benefit of longer spines, however, likely comes at a cost of decreased predatory ability or reduced fecundity due to energetic or structural constraints as seen in other cladocerans (Caramujo and Boavida 2000). As such, spine length in Bythotrephes might represent a life history trade-off between the survival benefits of a longer spine and its fecundity costs. Changes in spine length in response to changes in the relative importance of these costs and benefits will have important implications for food web dynamics because of the direct effects of spine length on fish consumption. Observed seasonal changes in spine lengths in both the Great Lakes (Bilkovic and Lehman 1997) and Europe (Straile and Hälbich 2000) have been interpreted as resulting from seasonal life history responses to the relative frequency of gape-limited and non-gape-limited fishes. The degree to which these seasonal changes in morphology are due to evolutionary responses to size-selective fish predation is not known. Furthermore, if this seasonal pattern of selection for larger spines late in the growing season is not opposed by fecundity benefits of smaller spines earlier in the season, then we would expect the seasonal evolutionary “ratcheting” of spine length to result in a net evolutionary elongation of Bythotrephes spine since invasion. Observed differences in distal spine (i.e., spine segment between the tip and first barb) lengths among Great Lakes (Sullivan and Lehman 1998) as well as between North America and Europe (Straile and Hälbich 2000) suggest that differences in the relative importance of gape-limited versus non-gape-limited predators might have resulted in local adaptation of spine lengths. This hypothesized evolutionary elongation of the spine will reduce consumption rates by gape-limited fishes. If there is a trade-off between the survival benefits of a longer spine and reduced ability to capture prey, any adjustment of Bythotrephes spine length to fish predation will have implications for interactions between Bythotrephes and its prey. Hypothesis Governmental/Societal RelevanceManagers in the Great Lakes and surrounding inland waters are increasingly using an ecosystem perspective when creating management strategies. Ecosystem management entails managing systems given our best understanding of the processes necessary to sustain ecosystem composition, structure and function (Christensen et al. 1996). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2004) has committed to ecosystem management, as have other government agencies including the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2001), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994; Beattie 1996), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1999), and the Canadian Wildlife Service (Wildlife Ministers’ Council of Canada 1990). Our proposed research contributes to this effort in ecosystem management by investigating rapid contemporary evolutionary change – an understudied but valuable approach to elucidating the causes and consequences of ecosystem change – in the shaping of trophic linkages involving Bythotrephes, a species of concern for the integrity of the Great Lakes (Shuter and Mason 2001). Our research integrates established techniques for examining species change, including sediment core analysis and resurrection ecology (e.g., Hairston et al. 1999; Kerfoot et al. 2004; Kerfoot and Weider 2004), within the context of exotic species invasion. Additionally, our research examines Bythotrephes effects in Great Lakes and inland lake systems where comparative work is lacking. In their paper on food web disruptions of invasive invertebrates, Shuter and Mason (2001) argue that: 1) life history characteristics of invasive species can govern how food webs are disrupted; and 2) by comparing ecosystems we can draw generalities about invaders and predict future change. By examining the effects of important traits of Bythotrephes on trophic linkages in multiple ecosystems, we can shed light onto the mechanisms of food web disruption by invasive species, and inform management at the ecosystem level. Relevance to Ecosystem ForecastingRelevance to Ecosystem Forecasting overlaps directly with the previous section on Governmental / Societal relevance. The proposal aims to identify and increase our understanding of a factor that affects Great Lakes food webs, and thereby add to our ability to build forecasting models. Cited ReferencesBaker, E.A., S.A. Tolentino, and T.S. McComish. 1992. Evidence for yellow perch predation on Bythotrephes cederstroemi in southern Lake Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res. 18: 190-193. Barbiero, R.P. and M.L. Tuchman. 2004. Changes in the crustacean communities of Lakes Michigan, Huron, and Erie following the invasion of the predatory cladoceran Bythotrephes longimanus. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 2111-2125. Barnhisel, D.R. 1991a. The caudal appendage of the cladoceran Bythotrephes cederstroemi as a defense against young fish. J. Plankton Res. 13: 529-537. Barnhisel, D.R. 1991b. Zooplankton spine induces aversion in small fish predators. Oecologia. 88: 444-450. Barnhisel, D.R. and H.A. Harvey. 1995. Size-specific fish avoidance of the spined crustacean Bythotrephes: field support for laboratory predictions. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 768-775. Barnhisel, D.R. and W.C. Kerfoot. 2004. Fitting into food webs: behavioral and functional response of young lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) to an introduced prey, the spiny cladoceran (Bythotrephes cederstroemi). J. Great Lakes Res. 30: 300-314. Beattie, M. 1996. An ecosystem approach to fish and wildlife conservation. Ecol. Appl. 6: 696-690. Bilkovic, D.M. and J.T. Lehman. 1997. Lipid concentration and size variation of Bythotrephes (Cladocera: Cercopagidae) from Lakes Eries, Huron, and Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res. 23: 149-159. Branstrator, D.K. 2005. Contrasting life histories of the predatory cladocerans Leptodora kindtii and Bythotrephes longimanus. J. Plankton Res. 27: 569-585. Caramujo, M.-J., and M.-J. Boavida. 2000. Induction and costs of tail spine elongation in Daphnia hyalina x galeata: reduction of susceptibility to copepod predation. Fresh. Biol. 45: 413-423. Christensen, N.L., A.M. Bartuska, J.H. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D'Antonio, R. Francis, J.F. Franklin, J.A. MacMahon, R.F. Noss, D.J. Parsons, C.H. Peterson, M.G. Turner, and R.G. Woodmansee. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 6: 665-691. Compton, J.A. and W.C. Kerfoot. 2004. Colonizing inland lakes: Consequences of YOY fish ingesting the spiny cladoceran (Bythotrephes cederstroemi). J. Great Lakes Res. 30 (Supplement 1): 315-326. Dettmers, J.M., M.J. Raffenberg, and A.K. Weis. 2003. Exploring zooplankton changes in southern Lake Michigan: implications for yellow perch recruitment. J. Great Lakes Res. 29: 355-364. Dumitru, C., W.G. Sprules, and N.D. Yan. 2001. Impact of Bythotrephes longimanuson zooplankton assemblages of Harp Lake, Canada: An assessment based on predator consumption and prey production. Fresh. Biol. 46: 241-251. Eshenroder, R.L. and M.K. Burnham-Curtis. 1999. Species succession and sustainability of the Great Lakes fish community. In Ferreri, C.P. and W.W. Taylor Ferreri [eds.] Great Lakes Fisheries Policy and Management. Michigan State Univ. Press. Facon, B., B.J. Genton, J. Shykoff, P. Jarne, A. Estoup, and P. David. 2005. A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 130-135. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296:707-711. Great Lakes Fishery Commission. 2001. Strategic Vision of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission for the First Decade of the New Millennium. Hairston, N.G. Jr. and T.A. Dillon. 1990. Fluctuating selection and response in a population of freshwater copepods. Evolution, 44:1796-1805. Hairston, N.B.,G. Jr., S.P. Ellner, M.A. Geber, T. Yoshida, and J.A. Fox. 2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol. Lett., 8: 1114-1127. Hairston, N.G. Jr., W. Lampert, C.E. Cáceres, C.L. Holtmeier, L.J. Weider, U. Gaedke, J.M. Fischer, J.A. Fox, and D.M. Post. 1999. Rapid evolution revealed by dormant eggs. Nature, 401: 446. Hall, S.R. and E.L. Mills. 2000. Exotic species in large lakes of the world. Aq. Ecosys. Health Man. 3: 105-135. Jaeger, A.L. 2006. Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function. Masters thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Johnson, J.E., D. Fielder, J.X. He, J. Schaeffer, D. Gondor, R.M. Claramunt, B. Breidert, D. Clapp, R.F. Elliott, C.P. Madenjian, P. Peeters, S. Robillard, D. Warner, and G. Wright. 2005. Analysis of the Chinook salmon populations of lakes Huron and Michigan, 1985-2004. Report from the Great Lakes Fishery Commission Common Session, Upper Lakes Meeting, Ypsilanti, Michigan. Kerfoot, W.C. and L.J. Weider. 2004. Experimental paleoecology (resurrection ecology): Chasing Van Valen’s Red Queen hypothesis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49: 1300-1316. Kerfoot, W.C., X. Ma, C.S. Lorence, and L.J. Weider. 2004. Toward resurrection ecology: Daphnia mendotae and D. retrocurva in the coastal region of Lake Superior, among the first successful outside invaders? J. Great Lakes Res. 30 (Supplement 1): 285-299. Lambrinos, J.G. 2004. How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology, 85: 2061-2070. Lee, C.E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 386-391. Lehman, J.T. and C.C. Cáceres. 1993. Food-web responses to species invasion by a predator invertebrate: Bythotrephes in Lake Michigan. Limnol. Oceanogr. 38: 879-891. Ludsin, S.A. and A.D. Wolfe. 2001. Biological invasion theory: Darwin’s contributions from The Origin of Species. BioScience. 51: 780-789. Mack, R.N., D. Simberloff, W.M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F.A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689-710. McAdam, A.G. and S. Boutin. 2004. Maternal effects and the response to selection in red squirrels. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B. 271: 75-79. Mills, E.L., J.H. Leach, J.T. Carlton, and C.L. Secor. 1994. Exotic species and the integrity of the Great Lakes. BioScience. 44: 666-676. Mills, E.L., J.M. Casselman, R. Dermott, J.D. Fitzsimons, G. Gal, K.T. Holeck, J.A. Hoyle, O.E. Johannsson, B.F. Lantry, J.C. Makarewicz, E.S. Millard, I.F. Munawar, M. Munawar, R. O'Gorman, R.W. Owens, L.G. Rudstam, T. Schaner, and T.J. Stewart. 2003. Lake Ontario: Food web dynamics in a changing ecosystem (1970-2000). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60: 471-490. Mills, E.L., R. O’Gorman, J. DeGisi, R.F. Heberger, and R.A. House. 1992. Food of the alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) in Lake Ontario before and after the establishment of Bythotrephes cederstroemi. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 2009-2019. Mooney, H.A. and E.E. Cleland. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc., USA, 98: 5446-5451. Palumbi, S. R. 2001. Humans as the world’s greatest evolutionary force. Science 293:1786-1790. Parker, S.L., L.G. Rudstam, and E.L. Mills. 2001. Retention of Bythotrephes spines in the stomachs of eastern Lake Erie rainbow smelt. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130: 988-994. Pothoven, S.A., G.L. Fahnenstiel, and H.A. Vanderploeg. 2003. Population characteristics of Bythotrephes in Lake Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res. 29: 145-156. Réale, D., A.G. McAdam, S. Boutin, and D. Berteaux. 2003. Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 270: 591-596. Reznick, D.N. and C.K. Galahmbour. 2001. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112-113:183-198. Reznick, D. N., F. H. Shaw, F. H. Rodd, and R. G. Shaw. 1997. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275:1934-1937. Schneeberger, P.J. 1991. Seasonal incidence of Bythotrephes cederstroemi in the diet of yellow perch (ages 0-4) in Little Bay de Noc, Lake Michigan, 1988. J. Great Lakes Res. 17: 281-285. Schulz, K.L. and P.M. Yurista. 1999. Implications of an invertebrate predator’s (Bythotrephes cederstroemi) atypical effects on a pelagic zooplankton community. Hydrobiologia. 380: 179-193. Shuter, B.J. and D.M. Mason. 2001. Exotic invertebrates, food-web disruption, and lost fish production: understanding impacts of dreissenid and cladoceran invaders on lower-lakes fish communities and forecasting invasion impacts on upper-lakes fish communities. Prepared for the Board of Technical Experts, Great Lakes Fishery Commission. Stockwell, C. A., A. P. Hendry, and M. T. Kinnison. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 94-101. Straile, D. and A. Hälbich. 2000. Life history and multiple antipredator defenses of an invertebrate pelagic predator, Bythotrephes longimanus. Ecology. 81: 150-163. Sullivan, C.A. and J.T. Lehman. 1998. Character variation and evidence for spine length selection in the invertebrate predator Bythotrephes (Crustacea: Cladocera) from Lakes Michigan, Huron, and Erie. Arch. Hydrobiol. 142: 35-52. Tollrian, R. and C.D. Harvell (eds). 1999. The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2004. New Priorities for the 21st Century – NOAA’s Strategic Plan Updated for FY 2005-FY 2010. September 2004. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. EPA’s Framework for Community-Based Environmental Protection. EPA 237-K-99-001. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. An Ecosystem Approach to Fish and Wildlife Conservation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. Vanderploeg, H.A., T.F. Nalepa, D.J. Jude, E.L. Mills, K.T. Holeck, J.R. Liebig, I.A. Grigorovich, and H. Ojaveer. 2002. Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 1209-1228. Wahlström, E. and E. Westman. 1999. Planktivory by the predacious cladoceran Bythotrephes longimanus: effects on zooplankton size structure and abundance. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1865-1872. Werner, E.E. and S.D. Peacor. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology. 84: 1083-1100. Wildlife Ministers’ Council of Canada. 1990. A Wildlife Policy for Canada. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa. Witt, A.M. and C.E. Cáceres. 2004. Potential predator-prey relationships between Bythotrephes longimanus and Cercopagis pengoi in southwestern Lake Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res. 30: 519-527. Yurista, P.M. and K.L. Schulz. 1995. Bioenergetic analysis of prey consumption by Bythotrephes cederstroemi in Lake Michian. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 141-150. *Link leads off GLERL's website |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||